Olivier Travers

Free cash flow for the win
Home > Archives > 2001 > January > 13 > Mojo Nation Responds (to Clay
Mojo Nation Responds (to Clay

Mojo Nation Responds (to Clay Shirky)
"Is the digital pasture we share endless or not? If it is -- when bandwidth, disk space, and processing cycles are really "too cheap to meter" or, in other words, "not worth worrying about" (how many people said electricity was too cheap to meter?) -- then resource contention is not an issue. However, if there is a boundary around this pasture, or if there are local bottlenecks, then the users must have a mechanism for allocating the resources."

I don't agree either that freeloaders are not a nuisance to P2P systems. Some careless people "pollute" Napster with broken or mis-named files that they don't care to erase or rename on their hard drive. Clearly those that don't care about how they contribute to the community can lower the overall quality of service. When time is the ultimate scarcity, these things matter.


Category(s):
Post a comment






Remember personal info?
Your e-mail address is used to send you future comments to this entry, but I won't use it for any other purpose and it won't appear on the site. I prefer you comment using your real identity, thanks.
Email this Story to a Friend




This form is used only to email this story to your friend. I won't save the email addresses you type in, or use them in the future in any way.


About
Contact



Web Feed

Powered by Movable Type

My profiles: