spam, spamt, spamt (tr. v.)

Home > Archives > 2002 > August > 8 > spam, spamt, spamt (tr. v.)

« The Economist, the Internet, Telecom and the Dow · McAfee.com distributes SecurityCenter with p-to-p apps »

I've just single-handedly decided that "to spam" should be an irregular verb.

08/09/02 update: Rick asks "Shouldn't it be spam, spum, spamt?" No, spum is too cute, while spamt sounds like spit. They spamt me, I have been spamt. More seriously, by definition can there be any rule about the formation and structure of irregular verbs?

Category(s): fun ·

Name: Email Address: URL: Remember personal info? YesNo	Your e-mail address is used to send you future comments to this entry, but I won't use it for any other purpose and it won't appear on the site. I prefer you comment using your real identity, thanks.

Email this entry to: Your email address:	This form is used only to email this story to your friend. I won't save the email addresses you type in, or use them in the future in any way. Message (optional):