The Microsoft Office I Really Want

In: software

27 Aug 2005

Are you looking forward to the next release of Microsoft Office, whenever that is and whatever it will do? Yeah, me neither. However, I can see how a lot of value could be delivered on top of supposedly ultra-mature products. Consider the needs of a virtual team doing things such as product management and business development. Sure, there’s an increasing number of web apps to cover such needs, but frankly, you can Ajax them to death and Excel’s frontend is still going to beat them to a pulp in terms of responsiveness, flexibility and depth (yes I want to be able to sort and filter and use garish colors if I want to). I tried Jot during its beta and even the regular text wiki experience was painful; every web grid I’ve played with was just that, a toy. Imagine that enabling keyboard shortcuts in GMail was considered a breakthrough. (Breathing down the neck of MS-DOS if you ask me, but everything old is new these days.)
What I really want is seamless integration between Excel on the frontend and an online relational database on the backend. No, I DON’T want some intranet Office Server crap or Groove client overload that I have to install and maintain myself, because that’s just not going to happen. And I’m not talking about just connecting Excel to some SQL source and browse it remotely (a feature I’ve been using once in a while), because this starts from the assumption someone created a SQL database in the first place. Nice but not nearly enough.
What I want is an internet application with a desktop frontend, with a choice of providers you can plug into, just like you can source other hosting services. The whole “internet Excel stack” should automagically normalize and synchronize the pseudo database work that most people do with it. And if it looks and tastes like a bunch of names and addresses, I should likewise be able to read/write/synch them through Outlook contacts. Wikify/blogify Outlook Today to have a mini-portal to point people to stuff and keep them on the same page (putthat stuff on the private web too), and we’re all set.
The magic part so unlike what’s available today is that you could start right from Excel, doing the junk you’ve done with it for a decade, but now it gets all cleaned up and consolidated so that your team can jump in without email attachments and tedious manual mergers. With synchronization down to the cell level (Just Figure It Out, sharing whole files is technology from last century and it’s a waste of our time).
Recap in case someone from Microsoft reads this (Scoble ping):

  • ASP service as a priority, not a half-baked afterthought.
  • No extra client install on top of the latest default MS Office install.
  • Make it as much backwards compatible as possible.
  • No crap that just doesn’t happen to work on Office Mac.
  • No glue grunt work necessary on my end to make the magic happen.
  • Data entry starts with Excel and Outlook.
  • Data goes into tidy, secure, backed-up server heaven by wizard magic.
  • Integrated basic wiki/blog/portal.
  • No butterfly, no dog, no silly animal whatsoever.

Or even shorter: no server, no install, no programming. Get back to your end-user roots, drop the full-time IT department requirement mindset, and charge a tax to your product and marketing teams every time they use the word “deploy”. Whie you’re at it, drop silly names such as “Microsoft Office SharePoint Portal Server 2003″ (I’m not making this up), really this should be how Office works out of the box. Do the hard work so I don’t have to, damn it! A team of several people needs to be able to be up and running almost instantly: “Got Excel? Fine, click on this URL, here’s your password, and start updating the sales pipeline already.”
Of course it’s not going to happen. Microsoft will die fat through death by incrementalitis (propagated by the nasty Enterprise virus). For people who start companies now, Microsoft is the new IBM. If you grow your business to the point where you need some IT guys, you’re going to whip them until they figure out “the internet way” rather than deploy heavy infrastructure within your walls.
Update: Robert tells me I might be surprised by what’s coming. We’ll see, I’d love to be proven wrong.
08/29/05 update: a comment below gets me to look again into, which leads me to The MS Office Killer, Vs. Microsoft Office? No contest. This Multiforce page is a bit abstract though.
09/19/05 update: Server-side Excel (different idea, interesting too).
10/10/05 update: Excel 12 blog.
06/06/06 update: Google Spreadsheets complements Excel?.
08/04/15 update: Zoho Sheet integration into Zoho CRM.

6 Responses to The Microsoft Office I Really Want


Chris Kenyon

August 28th, 2005 at 5:09 pm

Sounds to me like an advert for using and I am not talking about the sales reporting functionality.
Unless you have a particularly good IT team or you are deploying a very rich functionality app then MultiForce is definitely the way to start for most departments or small enterprises. This despite the level of per user cost.


Brian Tinkler

August 29th, 2005 at 6:43 am

Robert’s right on. Just wait. For Beta (so you can see Robert’s right), you won’t be waiting long at all. Just hold in there. We’re listening.


Rich Tanenbaum

August 29th, 2005 at 2:17 pm

Put Excel aside for a moment. Just on the database side, is there a product out there that will allow you to dump arbitrary reams of ad-hoc reams data into it (not necessarily all in one table) and it will automatically organize it intelligently for you?
(I’m not asking this rhetorically)


Olivier Travers

August 29th, 2005 at 6:48 pm

Chris, I looked into six months ago and Multiforce didn’t exist then. I’ll have another look. There’s indeed some talk of a collision course with MS Office at some point.
Brian, I’ll wait and see.
John, good question, I don’t know the answer (I’m not keeping up with these things very closely though). Since Microsoft is heavily invested in SQL Server and all sorts of database technologies, they’re as well placed as anyone to figure it out.


Andre Da Costa

August 29th, 2005 at 8:11 pm

I want better Excel Charts like the ones in Excel for Mac.



August 30th, 2005 at 6:40 pm

All excellent point, I really like the thought of a database that exists with in Metro documents for storing data. Then these documents can pull and share that data and be updated when the data changes. I would also like to see the ability to add SparkLines to my document. We already have excellent graphing stuff with Excel, lets make it so we can use smaller charts as well. -dru

Comment Form

About this blog

I'm CEO of an online/mobile trade publishing firm in the marketing and defense verticals. We strive to make news and data digestible and useful in an environment that is noisier by the day.

This personal blog mixes my thoughts and interests on politics, business, publishing, software, and more. Over the years I have posted items that turned out spectacularly wrong, and a few posts that better stood the test of time.



  • chris: thanks, I googled JetBlue interview and your site pulled together a number of excellent articles in [...]
  • Tim Marman: Assuming the market exists, it seems like the biggest challenge here is getting potential customers [...]
  • Konstantinos: ...and one of your first readers from back then (Webvoice anyone?) is here to congratulate you and w [...]
  • Harun Akar: just started offering FogBugz hos [...]
  • Sergio Rebelo: "Do you mind hearing some situational irony? I found this entry through a google search." Yes... me [...]